| Triple creamHydroquinone 4%, tretinoin 0.05%, fluocinolone 0.01%. Prescription. | Two label trials, 641 subjects, 8 weeks, against its own two-ingredient components.9 | Complete clearing at week 8: 38% and 13% with the triple cream, against 15% and 4% for hydroquinone plus tretinoin. In the open-label extension only about 1 to 2% kept complete clearing.9 | For short-term use, not maintenance. Possible reversible adrenal (HPA axis) suppression and ochronosis. Tretinoin is a teratogen. Not studied in Fitzpatrick skin types V and VI.9 |
|---|
| Hydroquinone alone2% to 4% in the trials below. | Used as the comparison arm in the azelaic acid, niacinamide and tranexamic acid trials. Also pooled in a network meta-analysis of 59 trials.1, 2, 3, 7 | Ranked 13th of 14 treatments against placebo in the meta-analysis.7 A 2022 review still lists it among the most well-studied agents.8 | The FDA reports rashes, facial swelling and ochronosis, which may be permanent.10 Health Canada notes cancer in laboratory animals and possibly humans.11 |
|---|
| Azelaic acid 20% | Double-blind, 329 women, 24 weeks, against 4% hydroquinone. Both used a broad-spectrum sunscreen.1 | 65% good or excellent results with azelaic acid. No significant difference between the creams on overall rating, lesion size or pigment intensity.1 | No allergic sensitization or ochronosis observed.1 |
|---|
| Niacinamide 4% | Randomized split-face trial, 27 patients, 8 weeks, against 4% hydroquinone on the other side. Sunscreen throughout.2 | All patients improved on both sides and colour measures did not differ. Good to excellent improvement in 44% with niacinamide and 55% with hydroquinone.2 | Side effects in 18% with niacinamide against 29% with hydroquinone.2 |
|---|
| Topical tranexamic acid 5% | Randomized, single-blind, 100 patients, 12 weeks, against 3% hydroquinone cream.3 | MASI fell 27% with tranexamic acid and 26.7% with hydroquinone, not a significant difference. Patient satisfaction was higher with tranexamic acid.3 | The trial reported fewer adverse effects with tranexamic acid.3 Pooled across trials, the meta-analysis put topical tranexamic acid’s side-effect rate at 36.75%, against 18.2% for hydroquinone.7 |
|---|
| Cysteamine 5% | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, 50 patients, once daily for 4 months.4 | Final MASI 7.2 with cysteamine against 11.6 with placebo (P = 0.02). One author is affiliated with Scientis Pharma.4 | A 2022 review reports no known severe adverse effects, and says more trials are needed.8 |
|---|
| Thiamidol 0.2% | Randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 200 participants, 12 weeks.5 | mMASI fell 36.1% with thiamidol and 16.1% with vehicle. Patient global assessments and digital colour analysis showed no significant difference. One author is from Beiersdorf AG.5 | No significant adverse events in either group.5 |
|---|
| Topical vitamin C | We checked it only through the network meta-analysis, where it ranked 5th of 14 against placebo.7 | A 2022 review lists ascorbic acid as an effective adjuvant with minimal side effects.8 | Not assessed on this page. |
|---|